When I disclose that I am an immigrant from Mexico, I am often met with remarks about the perceived corruption of Mexico’s leadership, both past and present, accompanied by questions about how Mexican citizens tolerate such malfeasance.
First, it is essential to correct a common misconception: Mexico is not a “third-world” nation.
Second, the United States, long regarded as a global superpower and a beacon of first-world governance, is not immune to similar criticisms. Since the Trump administration, with its cadre of loyalists in Congress, the Supreme Court, and a significant voter base—many of whom continue to provide unwavering financial and ideological support—it has become evident that the United States is grappling with its own version of the very issues it critiques abroad. This parallel invites reflection: perhaps U.S. citizens can now better comprehend the dynamics of systemic corruption often attributed to other nations.
Historically, U.S. leadership has enjoyed a reputation for ethical superiority, often positioning itself as a model for global governance. Yet, the aphorism “power corrupts” knows no borders. As I usually respond to such inquiries, the difference between Mexico’s leadership and that of the United States lies not in the absence of corruption but in the latter’s historical ability to sweep its failings beneath the guise of propriety—perhaps even beneath hand-woven, indigenous rugs from Oaxaca.
The distinction today? Trump does not sweep.